Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

CONCEPTUAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO SOLVING ETHNIC PROBLEMS

Abstract

In this article, the concept and principles of the ethnic problem, the existing theoretical views and conceptual approaches to solving the ethnic problems, the historical-legal basis and political mechanisms of solving the ethnic problems are studied and analytically researched. It also reveals issues of solving ethnic problems in mono-ethnic, multi-ethnic, non-ethnic (not based on any ethnic groups) states or in homogeneous and heterogeneous societies.

Keywords

ethnic problem, homogeneous and heterogeneous societies, mono-ethnic

PDF

References

  1. Bermeo N., “The Import of Institutions”, Journal of Democracy, No13 (2), 2002. – pp. 96-110.
  2. Blagoevic Bojana, Ethnic Conflict and Post-Conflict Development Peacebuilding in Ethnically Divided Societies. PhD. Dissertation, The State University of New Jersey: U.S.A., 2004. – P. 50.
  3. Blagoevic Bojana, Ethnic Conflict and Post-Conflict Development Peacebuilding in Ethnically Divided Societies. PhD. Dissertation, The State University of New Jersey: U.S.A., 2004. – P. 59.
  4. Crawford B. & Lipschutz R., The Myth of ‘Ethnic Conflict’: Politics, Economics, and ‘Cultural’ Violence, University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection, Research Series, Vol 98, 1998; J Mueller, ‘The banality of “ethnic war”, International Security, 25 (1), 2000, pp 43–72; Bruce Gilley, Against the concept of ethnic conflict, FEATURE REVIEW, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1155–1166.
  5. Eriksen T. H., Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press. Second edit. 2002. – P. 15-25.
  6. Hannum H., “Territorial Autonomy: Permanent Solution or Step towards Secession?” 2004. Манба: Paul Anderson and Soeren Keil, юқоридаги манба.
  7. Hong Jae Woo, Power-Sharing Solutions on Ethnic Conflicts: A comparative analysis of institutional effects on ethnic politics. The Korean Journal of International Relations, Vol. 45, No 5, 2005. – P. 10-12.
  8. John Dryzek “Political Inclusion and Dynamism of Democratization,” American Political Science Review. 90:2 (1996), p.486. Манба: Hong Jae Woo, ўша жойда.
  9. Juergensmeyer Mark, Global Rebellion: Religious Challenges to the Secular State. University of California Press, Berkeley, 2008.
  10. Kenneth McRoberts, “Canada and the Multinational State”, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. XXXIV, No. 4, 2001. – P. 687.
  11. Lijphart Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
  12. Mouffe Chantal, On the Political. London; New York: Routledge, 2005. – P. 130.
  13. Paul Anderson and Soeren Keil, Federalism: A Tool For Conflict Resolution? March, 2017 // https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317013058_Federalism_A_Tool_for_Conflict_Resolution
  14. Prazauskas Algis, Ethnic Conflicts in the Context of Democratizing Political Systems: Theses, Theory and Society 20(5), 1991. – P. 582.
  15. Rosel Jakob, Nationalism and Ethnicity: Ethnic Nationalism and the Regulation of Ethnic Conflict, in Turton David (ed.), War and Ethnicity: Global Connections and Local Violence. San Francesco: Boydell Press, 2002. – pp. 158-159
  16. Smith Anthony D., The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Wiley-Blackwell, 1991.
  17. Timothy Sisk, Power Sharing and International Mediation in Ethnic Conflicts, (New York: Carnegie Corporation, 1996).
  18. Yuval-Davis N., Gender and Nation. London: Sage Publications, 1997. – P. 92

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.