Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 3 No. 05 (2023)
Volume 03, Issue 05

Articles

CONDITIONS FOR THE OCCURRENCE OF INTERNAL INSTABILITY IN SYRIA

https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-jsru-03-05-08

Published 2023-10-12

  • Shakhzod N. Akhmatov

Abstract

Not only in modern times, but also since ancient times, relations between the countries of the Middle East region have played an important role. The center of the world civilization also corresponds to this region. The first manifestations of statehood also belong to this region. The Middle East is often called the “crossroads of the world”. This term was given because it is considered the region of origin of three religions: Christianity, Islam and Judaism, which are practiced by half of the world's population. Therefore, the Middle East is the gateway to India, the Far East, Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Europe. This is a sufficient reason for the region to become the center of the conflict of interests of major countries in terms of geopolitics, and today it remains a strategically, economically, politically, culturally and religiously important region.

Keywords

“Middle East”, Middle East Sommand, Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar, “Arab Spring”, “People’s Spring”, “Prague Spring”.

PDF

References

  1. Near East atamasini ingliz tilidan so‘zma so‘z tarjima qilinganda “Yaqin Sharq” ma’nosini bersa, Middle East atamasi “O‘rta Sharq” ma’nosini anglatadi. Biroq bugungi kunda Middle East atama “Yaqin Sharq” sifatida tarjima qilinmoqda. Near East atamasi siyosiy leksikonda kamroq qo‘llanib, Middle Eastga sinonim sifatida ingliz tilidagi manbalarda qo‘llanilmoqda.
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East
  3. The World Factbook, United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), 15 July 2008. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the– world– factbook/fields/2001.html
  4. «Faol geostrategik ishtirokchilar» – o‘z chegaralaridan tashќarida hukmronlik ќiluvchi yoki mavjud geosiyosiy holatni o‘zgartira olish yo‘lida ќobiliyat va milliy irodaga ega bo‘lgan davlatlar kiradi.
  5. «Geosiyosiy markazlar» – bu shunday davlatlarki, ularning ahamiyati ularning salohiyati yoki mazmunidan emas, balki ularning joylashishlari va tabiiy jihatdan yuzaga keladigan potensial zaiflik oqibatida geostrategik ishtirokchilarga imkoniyat tug‘dirib beradigan omillar bilan belgilanadi. Ko‘pincha geosiyosiy markazlar o‘zlarining geografik holatlariga bog‘liq bo‘lib, yo muhim mintaqalarga eltuvchi yo‘l ustidan nazorat o‘rnatish, yoinki geostrategik ishtirokchilarga resurslarga ega bo‘lishlarida to‘sqinlik qilish imkoniyati bilan belgilanadi.
  6. См.: Lynch M. The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East. – New York: Public Affairs. 2012. – С.304.
  7. См. Фененко А. Междержавная конкуренция на Ближнем Востоке: факты и тенденции. // Mеждународные процессы. – Том 12. – №3 (38). – Июль– сентябрь / 2014. –С.34.
  8. Sullivan C.J. Riding the Revolutionary Wave: America, The Arab Spring and the Autumn of 1989 // The Washington Review of Turkish and Eurasian Affairs. Rethink Institute. April 2011. // http://www.thewashingtonreview.org/articles/riding– the– revolutionary– wave– america– the– arab– springand– the– autumn– of– 1989.html
  9. Krauthammer Ch. The Arab Spring of 2005 // The Seattle Times. 21 March 2005. // ttp://seattletimes.com/html/opinion/2002214060_krauthammer21.html
  10. Cofman Wittes T. Learning to Live with the Islamist Winter // Foreign Policy. 19 July 2012. //: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/07/19/learning_to_live_with_the_islamist_winter
  11. Remarks of President Barack Obama by the President on the Middle East and North Africa // State Department. Washington, DC. 19 May 2011. URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the– press– office/2011/05/19/remarks– president– middle– east– and– north– africa%20
  12. Богатуров А.Д., Фененко А.В. Посткризисные тренды в мировой политике // Свободная мысль. – №2. – 2011. – С.119.
  13. Яковлев А.И. Региональные аспекты мирового кризиса: страны Арабского Востока: смена модели раз– вития // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25. Международные отношения и мировая политика. – 2013. – № 4. – C.13.
  14. См.: Коновалов И.П., Шубин Г.В. Современная Африка: войны и оружие / Отв. ред. С.В. Мезенцев. – М.: Социально– политическая мысль, 2012. – С.476.
  15. James Sater. ‘Egypt’s Dilemma: Democracy Without Democrats// http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles//3/D/6/%7B3D64DFC7– 8160– 4183– B721– 0F60092202F7%7DJS0113.pdf – 9 July 2015
  16. См. Фененко А. Междержавная конкуренция на Ближнем Востоке: факты и тенденции. // Mеждународные процессы. – Том 12. – №3 (38). – Июль– сентябрь / 2014. –С.34.
  17. Бедунлар – Кувайтда фуқаролик мақомига эга бўлмаган аҳоли қатлами // См. Фененко А. Междержавная конкуренция на Ближнем Востоке: факты и тенденции. // Mеждународные процессы. – Том 12. – №3 (38). – Июль– сентябрь / 2014. – С.34.
  18. Kuperman Alan J.A. Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATO's Libya Campaign // International Security Summer. – 2013. – Vol.38. – No.1. – C.105.
  19. Данилов Д.А. Европейский союз в поисках ответа на вызовы арабской весны // Индекс безопасности. – 2013. – Т 18. – № 3– 4 (102– 103). – С.107.
  20. Фененко А. Междержавная конкуренция на Ближнем Востоке: факты и тенденции. // Mеждународные процессы. – Том 12. – №3 (38). – Июль– сентябрь / 2014. –С.34.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.